Just going on from the title of this post we also can't mistake it for a piece of space debris as it's not from a rocket.
A large UFO with objects around it captured by the ISS live feed cameras in June 2021 defies logic.
We even see craft flying around this immense structure which doesn't resemble anything else that you or I are familiar with.
I've never come across anything like that before because I'd know instantly if I'd have seen it before. The definition and features are astonishing and the clarity is astoundingly alien-looking. This has to be the smoking gun ladies and gentlemen, it has to be!
Video
Jump to 1:09.50 to see the UFO sighting.
Is this the Mothership craft in space that the couple of Pentagon chiefs (Avi Loeb and Sean Kirkpatrick) when they released their papers? I'm going to tell you now that for me it ticks every box and it's the evidence that I've personally been looking for since I started on my journey to seek the truth and knowledge.
I feel surprisingly the same. I did wonder what it would look like if I came across the smoking gun, and I hoped that I'd see it and I also hoped that I didn't dismiss it as a hoax. It's in space which narrows it down for us because the usual suspects can't fake a space sighting. Not if NASA has the original.
Description
There's an almost bird-like appearance to this object which is if we imagine a bird with its wings outward and up but away from its body. It was filmed on the ISS live feed cameras on 09/06/2021.
I don't think NASA could answer this even if they wanted to. It's s probably why they've never gone on any record to announce this specific UFO which is why I can't find anything.
Does NASA have a secret agenda
Because there's a lot of their archival footage of strange anomalies happening in and around the ISS (International Space Station) you'd think they're somehow connected. To boot they don't answer many questions about these bizarre anomalies if at all.
ISS unusual event's
One of the unusual events at the ISS that sticks out the most is the sound of jet engines when filming the astronauts. There's sometimes a very loud piercing sound similar to a jet engine which could only mean that a jet possibly a 747 is fitted out to look like the ISS and the steep climbing and then diving down of the aircraft simulates weightlessness. That's actually how they train.
I'm not the only person who has mentioned this. There are also what looks like harnesses being used to strap in the astronauts again to simulate weightlessness. This is normally used when a TV interview has the astronauts lined up on the "ISS" with 2 at the front and 3 at the back.
We see astronauts grabbing imaginary harnesses and the telltale signs of a harness under their clothing. Elon Musk stated once that his CGI rendering was way better than NASA's. I'm not even going to mention the many, many examples of bizarre things happening with SpaceX.
Could it be that some UFOs are deliberately entering the camera's live feed? Is this a set process of introduction on their behalf or are we under surveillance by these UFOs?{alertInfo}
Lee Lewis UFO Researcher
Every time NASA has a UFO turn up on the ISS live feed the cameras are turned off and they don't mention the UFO when the cameras come back on. They've spent between $100 - 150 billion which was the estimate in 2010 (Google) and that makes it the most expensive object in human history via the Guinness World Records.
Some astronauts have disappeared just before they rounded the corner in the ISS module connecting tunnels. That was caught in a NASA video.
If you've got any thoughts on this post please share them with us in the comments section below, cheers. And please don't forget to share this post, thanks.
Credit: UAMN TV YouTube Channel/Rafael Navarro Ferrari/Jaime Maussan/UFO Sightings Footage/UFO Sightings/Ufosfootage/Canva.
Space Bat
ReplyDeleteThats a bullet with butterfly wings if I've ever seen one
ReplyDeleteTo me it just looks like a satellite.
ReplyDeletecant find this image in any search I know how to use. where do I find it?
ReplyDeleteCome on!
ReplyDeleteA lot of these are lights projected into clouds and drones. I’ve don’t it myself to reproduce these videos. Not to disprove something I didn’t believe in but to look for the real concrete data we all want. Qualified drone pilot here too and military pilot..
Plenty of video editing in a lot of the others. This is not definitive at all.
The volcano ones I’m not sure. A few of the objects seen from planes or trailing them, I’m not sure. The ones in space. Space is difficult bro. There is a very large amount of stuff up there and more going up every week. I have friends on various projects and some of the satellites/probes are crazy cool looking and big. Not unexplained though or lightyears ahead in technology.
Plus size when zooming can be deceiving with nothing of known distance/size next to to compare. Could be zooming in on an object that’s only a few inches.
In 28 years of flying I’ve never seen anything I can’t explain. Let me tell you, flying a Learjet at 40,000’ at night and turning off all the cockpit lights to watch the sky for hours on long trips. I watch the space station, satellites and recently starlink arrays. Seen lots of meteorites, space shuttle launches and re-entries, rocket launches, dragon launches and re-entries. I’ve watched from altitude as a civilian and a military pilot, with the naked eye and some of the most cutting edge NVG’s and reconnaissance equipment available today.
ReplyDeleteI know what definitive will look like. When I say definitive I mean something that has irrefutable metadata attached to whatever system detects and records one of these phenomena up close. Look at the professors at the University of Albany. The UAPx guys. They collect terabytes of 4 or 8k IR footage from a camera running 24/7. Along with other scientific equipment running in conjunction with it while collecting data on magnetic fields, radio waves, sound, spectral, etc.
These are some of the top scientists in their field. They personally witnessed the event and captured the data.
They have many more months ahead of them going over all this data. Even though they saw something they can’t explain they still have theories that could prove it’s nothing but they want the REAL concrete data that will come from this before saying, “Look this is the smoking gun of proof that we live in a simulation, the earth is flat and aliens made us”.
Let’s be the smart about this.
Only other thing is going to be live national tv broadcast to include the emergency broadcasting system while an entire city is witness to a landing and real time encounter. Followed by each day after and multiple more cities until it’s commonplace, we realize they can’t help us in our current plight and we go back to debating the point of view that Taylor Swift has on the male/female relationship and whether we should send more weapons to Ukraine, costing the US taxpayers even more while the FED raises interest rates another 25 basis points.
Anyway bro I saw some lights in the night sky near Socorro, NM back in Feb this year. “I”, the aviator of many years with flights all over the world, can not explain them away. I also caught them on my iPhone camera.
ReplyDeleteThey appeared as orange balls that at first looked like orbs right beside my truck while I was driving.
Here is where my argument above is valid. I thought they were right next to me. It scared me and I didn’t want to pull over. Even though I was coming to NM to visit my cousin who had seen something and we were going to go look together for these objects. Anyway, later when I paused the videos, zoomed in and went frame by frame I could see that after they appeared as these red/orange balls of light they would sit motionless for around 3 seconds and then flash bright white, then be gone. Appearing multiple times in different positions in the sky. So when going frame by frame the flash lit up the clouds nearby. These things were miles away and up thousand of feet. My perception of their distance was completely unreliable without something of known size and distance as reference. As a pilot and very experienced at gauging altitude, distance, direction and speed of objects/aircraft/weather I could immediately tell how far away they had been when I could see the clouds being illuminated by the flash.
That’s a long way back around to argue your opinion of the object in space. It was a fun trip back around though don’t you think? 😉
Listen man. I am out looking for and trying to get closer to whatever it is. I’m onboard with finding the smoking gun. So let’s focus on finding that instead. Along with all the qualifying criteria and expertise behind it that I mentioned above.
Instead of adding more dribble to the already plethora of misinformation and garbage that’s currently out there.
Respectfully
Matt
My perception of their distance was completely unreliable without something of known size and distance as reference. As a pilot and very experienced at gauging altitude, distance, direction and speed of objects/aircraft/weather I could immediately tell how far away they had been when I could see the clouds being illuminated by the flash.
ReplyDeleteThat’s a long way back around to argue your opinion of the object in space. It was a fun trip back around though don’t you think? 😉
I give up. My post length was limited at it mutilated my response 🤷♂️
ReplyDeleteMoral of the story. The truth is out there 😉